PDF Ebook Irreligion: A Mathematician Explains Why the Arguments for God Just Don't Add Up, by John Allen Paulos
Well, publication Irreligion: A Mathematician Explains Why The Arguments For God Just Don't Add Up, By John Allen Paulos will certainly make you closer to exactly what you are prepared. This Irreligion: A Mathematician Explains Why The Arguments For God Just Don't Add Up, By John Allen Paulos will be consistently great friend any type of time. You could not forcedly to consistently complete over checking out an e-book simply put time. It will be just when you have downtime and investing few time to make you feel enjoyment with what you read. So, you can obtain the definition of the notification from each sentence in guide.
Irreligion: A Mathematician Explains Why the Arguments for God Just Don't Add Up, by John Allen Paulos
PDF Ebook Irreligion: A Mathematician Explains Why the Arguments for God Just Don't Add Up, by John Allen Paulos
Irreligion: A Mathematician Explains Why The Arguments For God Just Don't Add Up, By John Allen Paulos When composing can transform your life, when composing can enhance you by providing much cash, why don't you try it? Are you still quite baffled of where understanding? Do you still have no idea with just what you are visiting create? Now, you will certainly need reading Irreligion: A Mathematician Explains Why The Arguments For God Just Don't Add Up, By John Allen Paulos A good writer is a good reader at the same time. You can define exactly how you compose relying on exactly what books to review. This Irreligion: A Mathematician Explains Why The Arguments For God Just Don't Add Up, By John Allen Paulos can help you to address the issue. It can be one of the right resources to develop your composing skill.
The advantages to take for reading guides Irreligion: A Mathematician Explains Why The Arguments For God Just Don't Add Up, By John Allen Paulos are pertaining to improve your life high quality. The life top quality will certainly not simply regarding the amount of understanding you will get. Even you check out the fun or enjoyable books, it will certainly help you to have improving life top quality. Feeling enjoyable will lead you to do something perfectly. Furthermore, the e-book Irreligion: A Mathematician Explains Why The Arguments For God Just Don't Add Up, By John Allen Paulos will offer you the driving lesson to take as a good factor to do something. You might not be ineffective when reading this e-book Irreligion: A Mathematician Explains Why The Arguments For God Just Don't Add Up, By John Allen Paulos
Don't bother if you don't have sufficient time to head to the book shop as well as hunt for the preferred e-book to check out. Nowadays, the on the internet publication Irreligion: A Mathematician Explains Why The Arguments For God Just Don't Add Up, By John Allen Paulos is coming to offer convenience of reading routine. You could not need to go outside to search guide Irreligion: A Mathematician Explains Why The Arguments For God Just Don't Add Up, By John Allen Paulos Searching and downloading and install the publication entitle Irreligion: A Mathematician Explains Why The Arguments For God Just Don't Add Up, By John Allen Paulos in this short article will provide you much better solution. Yeah, on-line book Irreligion: A Mathematician Explains Why The Arguments For God Just Don't Add Up, By John Allen Paulos is a sort of electronic book that you could obtain in the web link download given.
Why need to be this on-line publication Irreligion: A Mathematician Explains Why The Arguments For God Just Don't Add Up, By John Allen Paulos You may not have to go someplace to check out guides. You could review this e-book Irreligion: A Mathematician Explains Why The Arguments For God Just Don't Add Up, By John Allen Paulos whenever as well as every where you want. Even it is in our extra time or feeling bored of the tasks in the workplace, this is right for you. Get this Irreligion: A Mathematician Explains Why The Arguments For God Just Don't Add Up, By John Allen Paulos now and be the quickest individual that finishes reading this e-book Irreligion: A Mathematician Explains Why The Arguments For God Just Don't Add Up, By John Allen Paulos
Are there any logical reasons to believe in God? The mathematician and bestselling author John Allen Paulos thinks not. In Irreligion he presents the case for his own worldview, organizing his book into twelve chapters that refute the twelve arguments most often put forward for believing in God's existence. Interspersed among these counterarguments are remarks on a variety of irreligious themes, ranging from the nature of miracles and creationist probability to cognitive illusions and prudential wagers. Despite the strong influence of his day job, Paulos says, there isn't a single mathematical formula in the book.
- Sales Rank: #451809 in Books
- Published on: 2009-06-09
- Released on: 2009-06-09
- Original language: English
- Number of items: 1
- Dimensions: 8.00" h x .41" w x 5.00" l, .30 pounds
- Binding: Paperback
- 176 pages
From Publishers Weekly
After his advance calculations, math professor Paulos concludes that religion and, in particular, God just don't compute. In challenging the precepts of religion and religious thought through the application of logical arguments and sometimes not so analogous comparisons, Paulos's arguments prove quite compelling for those who are spiritually doubtful. However, the devoted are not likely to be persuaded by this sleight of hand with words. Dick Hill's wavering tone creates a manic mood, as his pitch, speed and intensity tilt back and forth with the text's various points. Generally, nonfiction narrators need a good deal of energy in their delivery, but Hill's performance borders on the overdramatic. While Paulos's discussion is intriguing, Hill narrates with an edge in his voice that is sure to increase the heartbeat of even the most sedate reader. While one doesn't need to be a mathematician to understand Paulos's arguments, sometimes his equations can be extremely challenging for listeners to fully visualize. Simultaneous release with the Hill & Wang hardcover (Reviews, Dec. 3).
Copyright © Reed Business Information, a division of Reed Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Review
“Reasoned, cool and concise--a good-natured primer for infidels.” ―Kirkus Reviews
“[Paulos] is as sure-footed as a tiger as he prowls through the theocratic landscape, pouncing on sloppy thinking. To a large extent he succeeds in demolishing the arguments of believers.” ―Phillip Manning, The News & Observer (Raleigh)
“[Paulos] knocks the props from under the classic arguments for the existence of God . . . The book is written with a charming skepticism that is not off-putting or arrogant.” ―Chuck Warnock, Amicus Dei blog
“Few of the recent books on atheism have been worth reading just for wit and style, but this is one of them: Paulos is truly funny.” ―Publishers Weekly
“Irreligion will, I'm confident, take a distinguished place in what one might call the canonical literature of the New Atheism.” ―Norman Levitt, eSkeptic
About the Author
John Allen Paulos is a professor of mathematics at Temple University. His books include the bestseller Innumeracy: Mathematical Illiteracy and Its Consequences (H&W, 1988), A Mathematician Plays the Stock Market, and A Mathematician Reads the Newspapers.
Most helpful customer reviews
116 of 120 people found the following review helpful.
Brevity is the something of wit--not "soul," though.
By Saganite
What "Irreligion" brings to the table is brevity. Sometimes I wished for a little more exposition, but ultimately I think Paulos's tactic was right on. There's little in "Irreligion" that hasn't been covered (and more comprehensively) by Stenger, Dawkins, Edis, and other science-based New Atheists, but only a convinced atheist is likely to read tomes such as those fine thinkers have produced. A religious skeptic or nominal believer, on the other hand, is not terribly likely to plow through so much material (and in some cases, insulting and excessive snark) as is present in works such as "The God Delusion." But she might find a fast-paced, easily digested little book like this one just the thing to stimulate thought and promote a more rational outlook. Atheists, like theologians, can tend to go on and on, self-importantly. The rare book like "Irreligion" that gets in, makes its provocative points, then gets out is a very welcome addition to neo-atheism literature, not least because of the vivid wit Paulos brings to the subject. I loved his analogy of something to a scholar who had proved that Homer had not written "The Iliad" and "The Odyssey," but they were "written by another blind poet of the same name." That's the sort of lowkey humor that makes the subject matter feel brisk and breezy rather than onerous, ponderous, and stale.
224 of 246 people found the following review helpful.
Non-Proofs of God's Existence
By Rob Hardy
For centuries, people who believe in the different gods that people have adopted have insisted that there are good logical reasons to believe in their particular gods. Logic and science can do nothing to disconfirm the existence of these gods, but at the same time, if an attempt at a logical proof of a god's existence is presented, then the proof can be logically examined to see if it holds water. John Allen Paulos has looked at the proofs and finds them leaky. Paulos is a mathematician who has previously told us how a mathematician plays the stock market or how a mathematician reads the newspaper. Now, in _Irreligion: A Mathematician Explains Why the Arguments for God Just Don't Add Up_, he goes for the big game. His book shows the results of his examination of the question that is the first sentence in his book: "Are there any logical reasons to believe in God?" His book is a review of the ways that religious people have demonstrated to their own satisfaction (but not to his) that the existence of God can be logically derived. He has written before on this sort of theme, but his book is an attempt to deal directly with the "inherent illogic to all of the arguments." Jonathan Swift said, "It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into", and Paulos acknowledges this: "I have little problem with those who acknowledge the absence of good arguments for God, but simply maintain a nebulous but steadfast belief in `something more'".
Plenty of the arguments for God's existence here are well known; in fact, they are classics, and have been the subject of discussion and refutation for centuries. They may fortify the faith of those who already believe (although Paulos shows that they are untrustworthy fortifications), but again, already believing is the key. Right off the bat is the First Cause argument, presented in Paulos's summary:
1. Everything has a cause, or perhaps many causes.
2. Nothing is its own cause.
3. Causal chains can't go on forever.
4. So there has to be a first cause.
5. That first cause is God, who therefore exists.
It all seems convincing at first sight, and believers who wish to use this sort of thinking as evidence for their beliefs would be wise not to give it a second look. Paulos explains that a big problem is #1 above, which assumes too much. An alternative #1 is, "Either everything has a cause, or there's something that doesn't," and there isn't any way of getting around the truth of that. If everything has a cause, then God does, too, as does his cause and so on forever; and if there is something that doesn't have a cause, there is no reason that this something has to be elevated into the supernatural, for the physical world itself might be the thing that does not have a cause, and that's an end of the chain.
And so Paulos goes on, through this brisk little book which takes on one supposed proof after another: the Argument from Design, the Anthropic Principle, the Ontological Argument, Pascal's Wager, and more. Each of the chapters, most less then ten pages long, dispatches each would-be proof. Paulos has used more logic and less mathematics here; there are no equations in the book, for instance, although there are dips into pure mathematics when discussing such things as probabilities for Pascal's Wager. There is a good deal of humor and wonderfully clear writing. Nonbelievers are probably already familiar with the arguments for and against God's existence, but some of Paulos's counterarguments are novel and all are expressed in a pithy and easily memorable form. Believers ought to enjoy puzzling out the challenges here, and should have a renewed appreciation for the importance of faith, however lacking logical confirmation, as the foundation of their beliefs.
45 of 47 people found the following review helpful.
Concise and witty thoughts of an intelligent writer
By Miro
To appreciate this book, one must understand what readership it is aimed at. This appears to be the people on both sides of the divide between religious and nonreligious who are neither utterly convinced atheists (although those might enjoy the book as well), nor unquestioning believers. It is for readers who are intelligent and interested in the subject of God's existence or nonexistence, but do not have the time or inclination to immerse themselves in 536pp philosophical books. These people would be most interested in the thoughts of another intelligent person, a person who has spent some time exploring the major arguments, and is capable of presenting them and his conclusions in a clear and concise manner. It is then up to the reader to agree or disagree with the reasoning.
The book would not convince religious people whose minds are closed, even if they read it. It will not convince people who deny the role of reason in the question of God's existence. And it is not a polemic with ivory tower theologians.
This is a gentle book. Paulos does not bring up the horrific facts of the criminal history of religion that Dawkins, Hitchens and others have explored in recent books. He concentrates on a few common arguments for God's existence, and shows how an intelligent person would find them wanting.
Irreligion: A Mathematician Explains Why the Arguments for God Just Don't Add Up, by John Allen Paulos PDF
Irreligion: A Mathematician Explains Why the Arguments for God Just Don't Add Up, by John Allen Paulos EPub
Irreligion: A Mathematician Explains Why the Arguments for God Just Don't Add Up, by John Allen Paulos Doc
Irreligion: A Mathematician Explains Why the Arguments for God Just Don't Add Up, by John Allen Paulos iBooks
Irreligion: A Mathematician Explains Why the Arguments for God Just Don't Add Up, by John Allen Paulos rtf
Irreligion: A Mathematician Explains Why the Arguments for God Just Don't Add Up, by John Allen Paulos Mobipocket
Irreligion: A Mathematician Explains Why the Arguments for God Just Don't Add Up, by John Allen Paulos Kindle
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar